%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Isabelle-HOT---2016
% Problem  : GRA039^2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_isabelle_hot %d %s

% Computer : n001.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 17 14:28:43 EST 2017

% Result   : Unknown 205.98s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GRA039^2 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_isabelle_hot %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n001.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 03:54:33 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 205.98/192.74  running nitpick for 7 s
% 205.98/192.74  Nitpicking formula...
% 205.98/192.74  Timestamp: 03:54:43
% 205.98/192.74  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 205.98/192.74  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 205.98/192.74  Trying 1 scope:
% 205.98/192.74    Empty
% 205.98/192.74  Limit reached: arity 65536 of bound variable too large; skipping scope
% 205.98/192.74  Nitpick checked 0 of 1 scope
% 205.98/192.74  Total time: 121 ms
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: nitpick
% 205.98/192.74  running simp for 15 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: simp
% 205.98/192.74  running blast for 15 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: blast
% 205.98/192.74  running auto+spass for 30 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: auto+spass
% 205.98/192.74  running fast for 15 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: fast
% 205.98/192.74  running z3 for 7 s
% 205.98/192.74  SMT: Solver z3: Counterexample found (possibly spurious)
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: z3
% 205.98/192.74  running cvc4 for 7 s
% 205.98/192.74  SMT: Solver cvc4: Potential counterexample found
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: cvc4
% 205.98/192.74  running best for 7 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: best
% 205.98/192.74  running force for 15 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: force
% 205.98/192.74  running meson for 15 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: meson
% 205.98/192.74  running fastforce for 15 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: fastforce
% 205.98/192.74  running spass for 18 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: spass
% 205.98/192.74  running vampire for 18 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: vampire
% 205.98/192.74  running e for 18 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: e
% 205.98/192.74  running z3_tptp for 18 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: z3_tptp
% 205.98/192.74  running spass(1) for 9 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: spass(1)
% 205.98/192.74  running e(2) for 9 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: e(2)
% 205.98/192.74  running vampire(1) for 9 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: vampire(1)
% 205.98/192.74  running vampire(2) for 9 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: vampire(2)
% 205.98/192.74  running satallax for 18 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: satallax
% 205.98/192.74  running leo2 for 18 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: leo2
% 205.98/192.74  running satallax(*) for 300 s
% 205.98/192.74  FAILURE: satallax(*)
% 205.98/192.74  % SZS status GaveUp
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------